I had a funny crash when I did
Editor := 'editor'
in a class using a sharedPool with a class variable named Editor
Now this is fixed in 1.4 but what we should do is to get the revert last accept
in the emergency evaluator working again :)
Stef
On Nov 15, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote:
> I NEVER had an image crash, of course i'm not stating that it cant
> crash, but would be nice to know how many people have to deal with
> image crashes and how often.
>
> Because, up to now, during my last 3 years of Pharo usage it never has
> been a big issue for me.
>
> Fernando
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Peter Hugosson-Miller
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think the troll said he was leaving, so let's just all take a deep breath,
>> be thankful for that, and move on.
>>
>> Positive energy is what we need here, feeding trolls drains us more than one
>> would think, so as far as possible we should just try and ignore them.
>>
>> Carlo's answer was cool, too ;-)
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Igor Stasenko
>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Currently, my Mac running 3 images. And it is hard to tell, but i
>> think one of them runs maybe more than month , without hangs, freezes
>> etc.
>> Now, why i should trust your words (not backed with anything serious)
>> that the software i use is unstable, when
>> i using it every day and it works well for me?
>>
>> On 15 November 2011 12:18, Guido Stepken
>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Ok, if it helps you to understand, that unstable software is quite useless
>>> for anybody ... will do that!
>>>
>>> Guido Stepken
>>>
>>> Am 15.11.2011 um 12:05 schrieb Marcus Denker
>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 15, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Guido Stepken wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think, programming, refactoring a peace of software has very much to do
>>>>> with model theory, Löwenheim-Skolem theory (related to fixed point
>>>>> theorem).
>>>>>
>>>>> Good programmers migrate code, addon's from one stable, consistent state
>>>>> to the other. These "stable states" are expressed in release numbers.
>>>>>
>>>>> What are you doing? Don't know!
>>>>
>>>> So why don't you then just unsubscribe from the mailinglist?
>>>>
>>>> We clearly are not up to your standards. And this will not change.
>>>>
>>>> I think there is no way that we can work constructively together, so the
>>>> best for all is that you just go away.
>>>> and everyone is happy. (you, too!)
>>>>
>>>> You can refactor according to Skolem, we refactor how we like it, and
>>>> everyone is happy.
>>>>
>>>> Marcus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Igor Stasenko.
>>
>
