On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 21 Dec 2011, at 12:15, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just out of curiosity: Does any of you use the GTInspector? > > > > I used to use it for my images. And it was pretty nice. Problem was the > amount of dependencies it had, the time it took me to install it, and > moreover, that since it depends on several dependencies it was always > complicated to successfully install it. Apart from that, I really like it. > > Thanks. What do you mean by complicated to install it? That each time I tried I found a problem. I don't remember exactly now. First, it was a problem with RB (which was used from Grease I think) which was not even loading in the image. Then it was the Keymappings which was broken and annoying ;) I like the GTInspector and I like Glamour and all its related tools, but I always wondered the same: isn't there a way to use Glamour just for the development part? What I mean is that in this example of the GTInspector, it would be nice if you can generate from Glamour a plain standalone Morphic UI that we can just load. Say I have developed using glamour and all its nice features and then as an output I get a running morphic. Then of course, there will be people who will always want the glamour version because they change the code or whatever. Anyway, does it sound crazy to have a way to "deploy" Glamour? Where did you encounter problems? > > Cheers, > Doru > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier." > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
