> Did you publish the patch? I guess that was fixed a long time ago. At least it does not crash my image, it just produces wrong results.
> What is wrong? > What would be good is to remove the VW compliant classes and layers because > like that it should be really simple. It is highly complex, because it does an abstract interpretation of the bytecodes and getting the offsets of the variables right is not trivial. In fact in the past 2 years several people have tried to fix (including me) and didn't get it to work. >> Indeed, we had to patch it to not crash in Moose. But, still it does not >> seem to work properly. Maybe you should rather use RBRefactoryTyper? It is slower, because it needs to parse all the involved source code; but it works correctly and uses a similar (even more powerful) inferencing algorithm. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
