On Dec 29, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Benoit St-Jean wrote: > 1) readily available, no ?
Again what is the list of package not loading that are important for you. > 2) I was not necessarily thinking about the UI. For instance, a lot of stuff > still references Preferences and break on load. So what is the point? We should have a Preferences packages with the squeak preferences? Sure it was in Deprecated 1.2. Then? Now if you do one publish it. > 3) Yeah, I do have a few DOS application that I do care about because, so > far, after all those years, they're the best at doing what they were designed > for an no Java (or anything else) apps have replaced them in terms of > performance and features. They're mostly tools but they work great and I > haven't found any decent replacement for them. Beside, this is a weak > argument Stephane! Do you still need that crappy 50 years old language > called COBOL ? I guess so, in some cases! No it is not. Look at Mac.
