>> Now for me you don't need to change the semantics of the Pharo >> Announcements again. Now for my code I will just use my own >> implementation that has exactly the behavior and performance >> characteristics I need. > > Lukas our state of mind is that we want the infrastructure gets better so we > like to change > for a better one if this better one is better.
Seems that the understanding of what is better/worse and what is progress/regress is rather different among people. > If everybody has its own version then we do not improve the infrastructure. Performance issues aside, the current implementation forces me to use a different implementation because Pharo's announcements have a different implementation of selecting the handler (point 7). However, the really weird thing is that Pharo's announcements are now suddenly inconsistent with the Pharo exceptions and how they select the handler. Do you think this is better or worse? Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
