On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Milan Mimica wrote: > This is what you get for trying to make a binary that just works on any x86 > Linux distribution. It won't work. Vendors don't like it, Linus doesn't like > it, RMS hates it :) The proper fix to all of this problems would be to > provide distribution specific packages. I know that's a lot more of work and > many more people should be involved into this, but how hard can it be? Any > piece of software aimed to linux has packages for most popular distributions, > so it is doable. And once you provide a decent package, vendors may take over > it and make it official and maintain it for you. > I could do the Slackware package.
excellent what we should do is that the package is automatically created using jenkins. > > PS. I do love on-click paradigm. Too bad it doesn't work. > > > On 11 January 2012 04:20, Robert Sirois <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been trying to work around this problem, but it can't be ignored now. > I've also noticed that any exceptions thrown in the image cause a crash as > well. > > Was there any solution, or is the solution to not use Arch Linux? > > Related to this thread: > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-September/033009.html > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-September/033361.html > > Thanks, > RS > > > > -- > Milan Mimica > http://sparklet.sf.net
