On 14 January 2012 12:13, Guido Stepken <[email protected]> wrote:
> IS there still a "Image" neccessary in Smalltalk then? Or has this former > "design approach" nowerdays rather significant disadvantages? (32 Bit, > hanging IO during sync, GC....) > As I see it, image is not something that has to reside in physical RAM, but it is necessary in Smalltalk. -- Milan Mimica http://sparklet.sf.net
