On Jan 17, 2012, at 10:07 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
> Silly question, but what happens to your newProcess if you don't resume it?
>
> [Beeper primitiveBeep] newProcess.
>
> won't beep... But:
>
> [Beeper primitiveBeep] newProcess resume.
>
> will…
The problem is that this new process is the only one (yes only one) of a
strange image
I generated with hazelnuts (I need to get the compiler working so that we even
evaluate an expression in this image :).
> If you did resume then
> - What is OCClosureCompiler?
I tried with OPAL because it did not work with the Compiler but since I
cannot debug it this is why I open a file and
put information inside :)
> - Does it generate an exception?
no
> - Did you try with a regular Compiler?
yes but it does not work.
in fact I do not understand why yesterday
[Compiler evaluate: '1 foooo' ] on: Error do: [:ex | ex inspect]
did not work and today it does :) so I guess that I should sleep more.
Thanks nicolas I should sleep more and breath deeper :).
Stef
> With a regular Compiler I clearly here the buzzer.
>
> Nicolas
>
> 2012/1/17 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Thanks guys
>> now what is really strange to me is that whe the code does not contain error
>> to make it compile I have to wrap it with on:do:
>> Any idea?
>>
>>
>>> and if I wrap the execution with a on: error do:
>>> I get
>>> Start33 in the file
>>>
>>>
>>> OCClosureCompiler
>>>
>>>
>>> if I remove the on:do:
>>> I do not get anything no beep.
>>
>>
>