On Jan 17, 2012, at 10:07 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:

> Silly question, but  what happens to your newProcess if you don't resume it?
> 
> [Beeper primitiveBeep] newProcess.
> 
> won't beep... But:
> 
> [Beeper primitiveBeep] newProcess resume.
> 
> will…

The problem is that this new process is the only one (yes only one) of a 
strange image 
I generated with hazelnuts (I need to get the compiler working so that we even 
evaluate an expression in this image :).



> If you did resume then
> - What is OCClosureCompiler?
        I tried with OPAL because it did not work with the Compiler but since I 
cannot debug it this is why I open a file and 
        put information inside :)

> - Does it generate an exception?
        no

> - Did you try with a regular Compiler?
        yes but it does not work.

in fact I do not understand why yesterday 

        [Compiler evaluate: '1 foooo' ] on: Error do: [:ex | ex inspect]
        
did not work and today it does :) so I guess that I should sleep more. 

Thanks nicolas I should sleep more and breath deeper :).

Stef

> With a regular Compiler I clearly here the buzzer.
> 
> Nicolas
> 
> 2012/1/17 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> Thanks guys
>> now what is really strange to me is that whe the code does not contain error 
>> to make it compile I have to wrap it with on:do:
>> Any idea?
>> 
>> 
>>> and if I wrap the execution with a on: error do:
>>> I get
>>>       Start33 in the file
>>> 
>>> 
>>> OCClosureCompiler
>>> 
>>> 
>>> if I remove the on:do:
>>> I do not get anything no beep.
>> 
>> 
> 


Reply via email to