On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Stefan Marr <[email protected]>wrote:
> And here we go: > > On 17 Jan 2012, at 19:37, Stefan Marr wrote: > > After fixing that, I get these numbers: > > #(102851 10781 10798 9511 10335 9883) > > Not really impressive. > > > > I did not immediately see how to avoid the compression. > > The image size goes currently up by ca. 50%, from 22MB to 31MB. > > #(76700 1787 1793 1768 1741 1748) > > That is space for performance: image size is at 39MB. > > > > > > Not that my version with an extra dictionary is still faster by about 20% > (1.4s vs. 1.7s) since it avoids the decoding from the compiled method. > > Is there any general use for such an embedding, > beside making the finder usable? > I have created a separate thread because under this subject nobody will read it. I will answer there. > > > Best regards > Stefan > > -- > Stefan Marr > Software Languages Lab > Vrije Universiteit Brussel > Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium > http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr > Phone: +32 2 629 2974 > Fax: +32 2 629 3525 > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
