Am 2012-01-29 um 13:17 schrieb Dave Mason:
>
> On 2012-Jan-29, at 4:22 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> is there a naming convention for such blocks. In the chapter I called them
>> escaping block
>> but I also used continuation blocks. (I do not like continuation blocks
>> since to me it is unclear) but
>> if this is a convention I would follow it.
>
> Continuation blocks is wrong - continuations are a particular thing and this
> would be confusing.
>
> Escaping blocks is fine, but I call them returning blocks. I could see an
> argument for either
I think these are "blocks with non-local return" :)
(as opposed to blocks with "local return" like [:x :y| x*x. x + y])
Best
-Tobias
