Absolutely.. it is better.. I do have a small personal implementation that allows me the luxury of not registering the change.. when halt is inserted.. but I agree there is no two opinions..
Toggle breakpoint if it works perfectly it will be the best but I have both issues: * The long methods in which I put Toggle breakpoint loses the sense of what line it is on .. jumps around.. very annoying there.. * Instability of painting.. I am not sure if I can pin point anything.. but has occurred almost only when I use this through Morphic UI construction.. The hack I have is temporary.. but also allows me to insert the self halt anywhere in the method code at the point I right click in the method and insert it ( sensibly though.. ). Till the Toggle breakpoint works perfectly. On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Luc Fabresse <[email protected]>wrote: > > > 2012/2/16 S Krish <[email protected]> > >> Toggle Breakpoint, my experience in last one month in Morphic projects is >> causing instability.. >> >> I prefer the self halt, that is comparatively rock stable.. I have never >> had the image crash out or cause unpredictable paint etc.. >> > > I think, it would be better to have a working toggle breakpoint which > doesn't produce a new version of the compiled method (less garbage in > methods' versions). > > Luc > > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I miss running and debugging a single test from Nautilus (the current >>> right-click menu on a method says 'Run Tests', plural, but maybe it only >>> run the selected). >>> >>> And the simple Toggel Breakpoint stuff, I hate modifying methods with >>> self halt just to have a look at what is happening. >>> >>> On 16 Feb 2012, at 11:36, Benjamin wrote: >>> >>> > Me too, it's one of my favorite :) >>> > >>> > >>> > This one, and the red icon for uncommented classes :) >>> > >>> > They are the two features which really have changed my way of working. >>> > >>> > >>> > Ben >>> > >>> > >>> > On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> On 16 Feb 2012, at 10:15, Luc Fabresse wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> And I forget to say that I didn't get why the background of some >>> methods is yellow? >>> >> >>> >> Method too long, I love this feature! >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >
