2012/2/21 Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> > > On 2012-02-21, at 21:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > > Ben > > > > I like the suggestion of mariano and luc. > > I discussed with them. > > > > - opening by default on packages is better because it does not > force you to display the full > > hierarchy. > => add preference setting > > > > > - could you try to see if you can just display the packages and > hierarchy without swapping them? > => add preference setting >
yes perfect. and by default do not swap ;-) Luc > > > > Stef > >>> One last thing: when you type the name of a class somewhere and you do > a cmd+b I think it would be much better if Nautilus open the "normal" > browser and not "hierarchy" one. > >> > >> having cmd+h for hierarchy would be great :) > >> > >> +9999999 > >> > >> to open a hierarchy when you do cmd+b is bad for me beacuse: > >> > >> 1) 99% of the times I browse that way, I want to see that class, and > 99% also the rest of the classes of that package, not the hierarchy > >> 2) I am used to that since the last..mm 3 years ;) > >> 3) Because it seems the hierarchy windows is slow in big cases > [Object browse] timeToRun 19225 so it took me 20 seconds to open the > window ;) > >> > >> Because of that, I much prefer cmd + to for a normal browse. I don't > pretend all agree, so I would be very happy when you have the setting. > Please let me know so that I can set it :) > >> > >> Cheers! > >> > >> > >> > >> Ben we should produce a configuration because this is important. > >> What you can do is at least load the baseline and snapshot only when > you will release on version for 1.4 and 1.5 > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Benjamin < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> To be honest, if it works, I do not want to lose my time on > Configuration > >>> > >>> > >>> It shouldn't be done by hand, but generated by a tool :) > >>> > >>> > >>> Ben > >>> > >>> On Feb 20, 2012, at 8:06 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Benjamin < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hello guys, > >>>> > >>>> I know a some of you are waiting for the integration of the RB engine > into Nautilus. > >>>> > >>>> Some of them are already implemented, so if you wanna test them, here > is the gofer script > >>>> > >>>> Gofer new > >>>> url: 'http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Nautilus'; > >>>> package: 'ConfigurationOfNautilus'; > >>>> load. > >>>> > >>>> (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfNautilusRefactoring) perform: > #loadDefault > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> So...that's the way of loading Nautilus with refactorings? > Wouldn't it be better to include RB dependencis in ConfigurationOfNautilus > and have a specific group there. So you can do for example > >>>> > >>>> ConfigurationOfNautilus project stableVersion load: > 'WithRefactorings'. > >>>> > >>>> ? > >>>> > >>>> BTW, I checked the ConfigurationOfNautilusRefactoring and it looks > you miss a critical feature of Metacello: project references :) From > ConfigurationOfNautilusRefactoring you can directly depend on > ConfigurationOfRB or ConfigurationOfNautilus rather than duplicating > everything in there. Don't tell Stef you didn't read the chapter hahahaha > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> It loads everything. > >>>> > >>>> For now I have only done some refactorings for classes, so if you > popup the menu on a class, a new item named Refactoring should appear :) > >>>> > >>>> Moreover, the 'rename class' method is replaced by the RB one :) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks in advance for your feedback, and if you want to participate, > you are more than welcome :) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Ben > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Mariano > >>>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Mariano > >>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Mariano > >> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > >> > > > > > > >
