Thanks Sven, you inject me the desire of put hands on the stuff asap, but unfortunately, need to end other things first (business related things I mean).
Thanks really! 2012/2/22 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> > > -- > Sven Van Caekenberghe > http://stfx.eu > Smalltalk is the Red Pill > > > > > On 22 Feb 2012, at 22:04, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > >> Hi Norbert! > >> > >> Yes, I know that the situation is better with Zinc (I checked the code > and really look nice and simple to understand). I only mentioned XMLRPC as > a mere example of how the things become unusable so fast. > >> > >> Talking about this what you guys consider best, migrate XMLRPC to 1.3 > or directly to 1.4 ? > > > > > > There should be not that much difference for XML and Zinc API between > 1.3 and 1.4 (even if Zinc changes much more than XML. > > > > Now I code in 1.4 most of my time. > > > >> > >> Germán. > >> > > > > Normally you would write XMLRPC against Zinc HTTP Components and XML > Support, both are working fine on 1.3 and 1.4. Pharo 1.3 is released and in > that sense more stable (as in predictable and not changing as much), but > 1.4 has much more of the latest features/fixes and is generally more fun > (but you'll be living on the edge). > > Here is an XMLRPC call without the infrastructure of generating/parsing > the proper XML: > > | call | > call := '<?xml version="1.0"?> > <methodCall> > <methodName>examples.getStateName</methodName> > <params> > <param> > <value><i4>41</i4></value> > </param> > </params> > </methodCall>'. > ZnClient new > url: 'http://www.cookcomputing.com/xmlrpcsamples/RPC2.ashx'; > entity: (ZnEntity with: call type: ZnMimeType applicationXml); > post. > > Regards, > > Sven > > > > > -- ============================================ Germán S. Arduino <gsa @ arsol.net> Twitter: garduino Arduino Software http://www.arduinosoftware.com PasswordsPro http://www.passwordspro.com greensecure.blogspot.com germanarduino.blogpost.com ============================================
