Christoph,

Am 23.02.2012 um 09:31 schrieb Christoph Wysseier:

> Dear Andreas
> 
> Am 22.02.12 23:00, schrieb Andreas Wacknitz:
>> 
>> Am 22.02.2012 um 10:34 schrieb Janko Mivšek:
>> 
>>> S, Christoph Wysseier piše:
>>> 
>>>> Stéphane Ducasse:
>>> 
>>>>> I'm convinced that having support for multitouch event/ genie and
>>>>> others works (for iPad = $$$$) is important.
>>> 
>>>> Without pretending to know the future, IMHO standalone apps for tablets
>>>> and mobile will disappear over time. Out of my perspective it would be
>>>> far more important to move in the direction of web-based technologies
>>>> also in this area. Looking at the success stories of Pharo and our own
>>>> strategy I do not see the advantages of having multi-touch support for
>>>> the development of such applications.
>>> 
>>> I agree completely that web based techologies are where we should go
>>> because we have advantage here with Smalltalk while for any kind of GUI
>>> we are off.
>> [stuff deleted]
>> 
>> I like Smalltalk the language for its orthogonality and power. If I hear a 
>> statement
>> like "we should go<enter hype term here>  because its the future!" I have 
>> the feeling
>> that somebody wants some followers on his or her main area of interest.
> 
> Although I do not believe Web technolgies to be just a hype, it was not my 
> intention at all to convince everyone working with Pharo to use it from now 
> on for web applications only. There are of course several stakeholders with 
> different business or community ideas. Nevertheless, as we and others are 
> using Pharo as an IDE to develop web applications we need to be able to count 
> on the support of the board and community that the further development 
> considers our business model which does not lock out other ideas at all.
> 
My message was not a reaction to your mail but to Janko's. I want Smalltalk 
(and especially Pharo) as an all purpose system.
In my opinion it's a mistake to focus on a certain area like web technologies. 
And I guess as long as Pinesoft is doing well in business with
traditional GUI's and INRIA is interested in research in dynamic languages (and 
not dynamic web languages) I don't have to fear that Pharo will go in that 
direction :-)

Regards,
Andreas

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to