On 24 February 2012 11:22, Henrik Johansen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 24, 2012, at 4:05 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > >> >> Anyways, i don't like the fact that it copying the rendered stuff from >> video memory back to main memory, >> and then copying stuff back to video memory (but this time by morphic + VM). >> But this was a cheap way to get demo working and morphic integration. >> >> If i would be making app which using opengl for rendering, i would >> never copy things like that, >> because it just a waste of cycles causing a big impact to frame rate. >> What works for demo, is not really applicable in serious application. :) >> In serious app, i'd rather copy morphic Display form into separate >> texture and then render it along with other stuff, which is already >> in video memory. >> But this approach needs more time investments, which currently i don't >> have, and actually heavily depends >> on what you want from your app. > > I think you'd have to ditch the idea of rendering the Display bitmap > entirely, if you want to write GL windows to screen directly. > Otherwise, you would _never_ get compositing correct, think translucent > morphs on top of the GL window for example. > Yes, but this is for cases if i want to make opengl stuff embedded into morphic world. But if i don't want it, i don't need to care :)
> As such, you'd need to rewrite the entire compositing window manager using GL > buffers, and only as a side-effect flush the rendering results to a Display > there for purely backwards-compatability reasons. > If we would have an easy control of host windows, i.e. a way to create new windows and create GL contexts for them in a way we want. But today's VMs having little for that. What needs to be done first is to make image to be in direct control of host windows, so then we can control GL & Display in a way we want. Because right now, VM doing "magic" with main window by binding Display form to it , and the code which updates it also there, so you simply cannot do any compositing et all , since the code you need to modify is on VM side. > Cheers, > Henry -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
