On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote: > I agree that everything (that could be done automatically) should be > automated (By Ulysse or whatever), but you need > some human interaction to see if the change is good enough (coherent, > consistency, design flaws, etc.). > As a newbie i'm always looking for someone to review my easy fixes. :) > Absolutely, what I wrote was intended to be about how to facilitate that human interaction by improving the parts of that process which are automatable, and in fact so cumbersome that the barrier to actually reviewing is in most cases too high.
I doubt you would find anyone arguing a review can be fully automated with satisfying results. :) Cheers, Henry
