On 25 February 2012 21:48, H. Hirzel <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW, which version of FF? > well, it updates itself quite frequently nowadays.. i just can tell that it is one of most recent ones.
> Yes, it is probably slower that a native Morphic plus VM. I just used Opera. > > The other side of course is that you do not need to deploy anything. > Exciting to have a Morphic experience in a regular web site with a > download of a text file of 213kB. The JavaScript engines get faster > with each browser version. It might be good enough for many cases. > > Jens Mönig writes that he is working with morphic.js on things like this > http://chirp.scratchr.org/dl/experimental/JsMorphic/nasciturus.html > > So it depends on what to want to use it for. > > My main point however --- I think it is exciting to see a cleanly > written JavaScript port of Morphic. > No doubt. > --Hannes > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
