On 29 Feb 2012, at 12:58, Janko Mivšek wrote: > For Pharo there seems everyone is avoiding this idea, mostly because of > image corruption fear. Well, we need to improve the robustness of Pharo > image and VM then this fear will vanish. It is obviously doable, if VW > is reliable enough, why not once Pharo?
I am trying to be polite: remarks like this are unfair and not based on the experiences of most of the people in the Pharo community or of the companies using Pharo. It is perfectly possible to have stable long running servers based on Pharo. Sneaking in these phrases in simply spreading FUD. Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe http://stfx.eu Smalltalk is the Red Pill
