I also found some problems using void* in linux... maybe you want to use long 
(which has same size)... I "fixed" my problems that way. 

yes... maybe we need to look at FFI to see why void* has problems some times, 
but well, that can help you atm (sorry for not having a better answer)

Esteban 

El 29/02/2012, a las 8:11p.m., Igor Stasenko escribió:

> On 1 March 2012 00:58, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Another glitch: is there any problem passing things as void*?  I'm getting 
>> failure to coerce errors that did not arise before.
>> 
> No idea. As you may suspect, i stopped using FFI/Alien once i got
> NativeBoost toy to play with.
> 
> Please file the issue, describing the problem. so we can look over it
> and fix it.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [[email protected]] on behalf of Igor Stasenko 
>> [[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 5:51 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] FFI on 1.3: compile fields
>> 
>> On 1 March 2012 00:37, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Does 1.3 by default not create field accessors?  Why is that?  I thought
>>> nothing was happening.
>>> 
>> 
>> Good question, i'd like to know the answer too.
>> It is related to MC final 'installation' phase,
>> where it initializing all classes.
>> 
>> In NativeBoost i was also using
>> 
>>  noteCompilationOf: aSelector meta: isMeta
>>        "A hook allowing some classes to react to recompilation of certain 
>> selectors"
>> 
>> but there was a big question, at which point this hook is triggered,
>> and looks like some changes in MC stop triggering it/triggering at
>> wrong time (not all methods get into a class/ class not initialized
>> etc),
>> which makes it not very useful.
>> 
>> So i ended up creating a DNU handler on instance side, then on DNU i
>> check if i have field accessors and if not,
>> compile them on the fly.
>> 
>> 
>>> Bill
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Igor Stasenko.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
> 


Reply via email to