This may be a stupid question… (As far as I understand, condensing the changes is not the same) Why don't you increment the version number of the sources file to 1.1 and use a fresh changes file?
Max On 06.03.2012, at 18:42, Philippe Marschall wrote: > On 06.03.2012 09:44, Marcus Denker wrote: >> ... what do we do? >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 >> (but that will not help that much. And someone would need to look at the >> tracker entry and make >> it ready for integration). >> >> or just do a condense? The history is in Monticello. > > Do people actually really rely on the .changes or just say they do? I'd be > fine with just a condense. > > Cheers > Philippe > >
