On Mar 8, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> Stef wrote:
>> We are getting there…
>> Did you ever look at the code of both systems?
>
> No - not really.
>
>> I like the ui part now
>
> At least the videos look shiny ;)
indeed and this is what I want don't get me wrong :)
>
>> yes we can express a model and given a spec we
>> can create a complex widget
>
> Sounds like UI specs in VW.
kind of
> Do we have that already?
In Spec
But we built experiments and analyze them and iterated now we know that we are
in good direction.
>
> However - a builder/placer should be the goal.
> Writing specs by hand can get very complex…
Yes but one step at a time and taking care of not creating yet another layer on
top of another layer:
- if widgets need some special behavior it should integrated
- ...
>
> What I like about the videos from nullPointer is that
> it satisfies the common workflow expectation known from
> other UI builders (VisualStudio, Java IDEs): open the builder,
> add some widgets, set some properties, double click
> a button for the event handler, add code and run.
You never modify one? i.e. reopen it and modify it?
You never reuse a widget?
Because for me I hate to have to reimplement something I already did.
This is because benjmain was fed up doing all the time the same that he is so
interested in Spec :).
> But as you said - that says nothing about the implementation
> under the hood.
>
> Bye
> T.
>
> --
> Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
> belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
>
