thanks good catch! Stef
On Mar 20, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > The problem is that the new implementation of union: and intersection: makes > reference to class directly. Instead, they should use species. > > I opened a an issue: > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 > > and created the corresponding slice: > Name: > SLICE-Issue-5523-Collection-union-and-intersection-should-use-species-TudorGirba.1 > Author: TudorGirba > Time: 20 March 2012, 7:25:55 am > UUID: b3944736-b2d8-4c30-ad24-3c39c2a18cf9 > Ancestors: > Dependencies: Collections-Abstract-TudorGirba.158 > > use species instead of class for Collection>>union: and intersection: > > > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > On 19 Mar 2012, at 20:10, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> >> On Mar 18, 2012, at 10:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> I am a bit puzzled. How comes that a new version of #union: break down so >>> many tests. >>> #union: is a simple operation. >> >> Yes I would like to know it too. >> Do you have one single case that we can understand? >> >> Stef >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > If you can't say why something is relevant, > it probably isn't. > >
