On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > >> >> Am 20.03.2012 um 09:23 schrieb Pavel Krivanek: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to ask you on your opinion about time scale of some big >>> repackaging steps. At start we talk about issue 5520 >>> (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5520#makechanges) >>> that should rename Morphic package to Morphic-Base. The reason to do >>> it is to prepare Morphic and MorphicTests packages for the next >>> reorganization, namely to separate Morphic-Core package(s) with >>> content of the uMorphic image (the minimal morphic image with only the >>> most basic subset of the Morphic). >>> >>> The question is if we want to do it now or wait on the verson 1.5. At >>> start it is only the reorganization of packages that should not change >>> any behavior of the system. On the other hand, we may expect that it >>> will bring some sort-term problems. >>> >> This question is almost easy to answer. There are no things that do not >> produce side effects. So this is a no go in 1.4. But it can also mean that >> 1.4 needs to be shipped soon. Or just open 1.5 before 1.4 is shipped. But >> that might to be too much work for Marcus et. al. > > We did that in the past. > Now we should get all tests green for 1.4. > After only we should open 1.5 else… the fun will take over >
To say now that we only need to make to two tests green is like to say in late 19th century that we need to solve only two little problems: black body radiation and Michelson's experiment ;-) -- Pavel >> >> Norbert >> >> > >
