Ok I will digest that :)
Thanks for the food for thoughts.
>
> yes.. now since i remember our discussion about it.. yes.. i am still
> against it.
> because it just violating the principle of least authority:
> - any guy who thinks he is a position to suspend announcements can do it,
> but since he doesn't knows who else subscribed to them, he simply can
> ruin the logic of other event consumers...
>
> I think we should think about other approach:
> In case of system changes notifier , a "do silently" was do not log
> the changes.
> That means that if we could have a logger plugged into system
> announcer, one should tell a system logger to ignore system
> notifications
> and do not log them for a while, instead of making system notifier
> suspending all subscriptions, leading to unknown consequences for the
> rest of
> event listeners!
> If guy wants to suspend logging, he should tell logger to suspend it..
> like that, no other facilities will be affected.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>
