On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Chris Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Serge Stinckwich > <[email protected]> wrote: >> In order to have something coherent, every sub-librairies of >> Sci-Smalltalk should be packaged as 'Math-XXX'. Right now, i have >> Math-Random and Math-Random-Tests. >> > Just curious, why Sci in the name, but Math as the package? I could > see that growing over time, but to start with the discrepancy seems > odd. Not a problem, just odd.
I think that "Math-XXX" is more easy to understand for than "SciSmalltalk-XXX" (for someone who don't know what is SciSmalltalk). Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
