On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18 April 2012 21:11, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Eliot Miranda <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Put a halt in SystemChangeNotifier >> #methodRemoved: aMethod selector: > >>> aSymbol inProtocol: protocol class: aClass > >>> > >>> Then evaluate: > >>> > >>> TestCase compile: 'foo'. > >>> TestCase removeSelectorSilently: #foo. > >>> > >>> And the halt stops.... > >> > >> > >> you mean there's no halt? That's what doSilently: is supposed to do, > >> prevent notifications of programming events (add, change, remove et al). > >> Right? > >> > > > > > > no, sorry, I meant that it *does* halt when (from what I understood), it > > shouldn't. > > > > the implementation of it is done so, that SystemChangeNotifier always > receives those events, > but if you in silent mode it doesn't broadcasts it to subscribers. > > Thanks Igor. I noticed that later on. It seems I was confusing the system somehow. > > > > >>> > >>> > >>> I am doing something wrong? > >>> > >>> thanks > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Mariano > >>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> best, > >> Eliot > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Mariano > > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
