On 26 April 2012 23:05, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why holding 35 parsers in memory is a problem?
>
> I imagine that the trees should be much much larger.

It's not really a problem. I just think it's less elegant than keeping
the parsers around only during a parse.

frank

> Stef
>

Reply via email to