Marcus Denker-4 wrote
>
>> On 21 September 2011 11:48, Torsten Bergmann <astares@> wrote:
>>> at [1] you mentioned a port of MethodWrappers to Squeak 4.2.
>>> Is there also a port for Pharo available or do you plan to
>>> port it?
> But that is working in Pharo already, isn't it?
>
Most of the tests pass in both 1.4 and 2.0. The only failure,
#testNoProtoInstanceCount, is a test that does not make sense to me (I think
it should fail) and the ~6 errors are due to a missing
MethodNode>>ensureNotQuick, which doesn't exist in Squeak 4.2 either
Also, Gofer does not like packages with dots in the name, so one has to
write "MethodWrappers4.2-eem.25" "MethodWrappers4", not "MethodWrappers4.2".
I'm guessing this will fall apart when "MethodWrappers4.3" is released...
Gofer it
squeaksource: 'MethodWrappers';
package: 'MethodWrappers4';
load.
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/MethodWrappers-tp3829576p4601624.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
