Why not to have both :-) -- Pavel
3.5.2012 v 5:05, Serge Stinckwich <[email protected]>: > When you download a lot of images every week, this is nice to have a > build number in order to recognize them. > Regards, > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Francisco Garau > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> How about Jenkins putting a build suffix to the images? -- something like >> Pharo-2.0.build-20040.image >> >> At the moment, all the build generate files with the same name. >> >> https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0/41/ >> >> 2.0 #20040 >> >> Pharo-2.0.changes 13069724 >> Pharo-2.0.image 18732936 >> Pharo-2.0-one-click.zip 19242637 >> Pharo-2.0.zip 14962904 > > > > > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://doesnotunderstand.org/ >
