On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>wrote:
> no! :) > > fileIn is too complex (and too important) to be a convenience method > (IMHO, it should never be in a Stream), it needs it's own class: CodeLoader > or something like that. > > but of course, while I disagree with your particular example, I agree in > adding convenience methods when their are convenient ;) > Don't be so hard, as an extension method should be fine :P. Now, The CodeLoader is a different story, I'll have a look tomorrow to see how hard is to move it :). > > best, > Esteban > > On May 4, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > > Now that Filesystem is built-in, how about starting to add some > convenience > > methods, like this simple one... > > > > FileReference>>#fileIn > > > > FileStream fileIn: self fullName. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/FileReference-convenience-tp4609828.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > >
