Thanks mariano. I love when you write your phd this is so boring that you have 
to do something else :D
And this is great to have a real layered system.
Stef


> 
> 
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Good idea guys. I am trying now...
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On May 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
> 
> >
> > So...what do we do?  we just accept the depedency?
> >
> > Why not use a CompiledMethod instead?  More on, the TraitMethodDescription 
> > already knows the selector, so storing only the behaviors containing 
> > related methods should be enough...
> >
> 
> Yes, the code is old from a time when CompiledMethod did not know the class 
> or selector.
> 
> So this can be rewritten to just use compiledMethod.
> 
> So guys. I did an experiment with this. So I used a CompiledMethod rather 
> than a RGMethodDefinition. I did a changeset (not sure if Monticello can 
> handle these changes) just to have another one eye's on it. Basically, I 
> needed to change the senders of #locatedMethods because now such method 
> answers a collection of CompiledMethod rather than RGMethodDefinition.  
> 
> I tested with Fuel (fuel has lots of tests regarding traits) and even 
> building PharoCore from PharoKernel without Ring in kernel and putting all 
> packags in the same bundle.  (it works!!!).
> However, the traits tests from Pharo are completly broken and it is 
> impossible to do something. You run one test and you got 30 debuggers. It is 
> impossible to test.
> 
> So, if someone can take a look, I really appreciate it.
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5815
> 
> wait. I found a problem... I will upload a new version soon. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
>        Marcus
> 
> 
> --
> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> 


Reply via email to