Santi,
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Santiago Bragagnolo <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I want to know if we've missing primitives in our typeinference
> 'primitive-map'. Several primitives allow us to decide the return type of
> the method that returns just the primitive.
> Actually, the defined primitives in the typeinference 'primitive-map' are
> the related with squeak 2.8... it's been a while :P.
>
Download the VM code as said in Mariano's Blog and have a look at
implementations of #initializePrimitiveTable. There you will find stuff
like:
(0 primitiveFail)
(1 primitiveAdd)
(2 primitiveSubtract)
(3 primitiveLessThan)
where the left item is the primitive number, the right one is where to fond
the primitive code. Search implementors of the item in the second column
and you are in the primitive code :). voilá.
Guille
>
> 2012/5/8 Frank Shearar <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi Santiago,
>>
>> On 8 May 2012 03:59, Santiago Bragagnolo <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all, yes. me again.
>> >
>> > I'm searching for a primitive-definition, something like
>> > code : what.it.do : relatedType if apply.
>> >
>> > Is there something like that?
>>
>> Are you looking to type a primitive call?
>>
>> frank
>>
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > Santiago.
>>
>>
>
