On May 8, 2012, at 10:38 PM, Benjamin wrote: > I will try to maintain Nautilus for 1.4 as long as I can, but we have all to > keep in mind that now the main goal for Nautilus is to make it the default > browser for 2.0. > > So obviously, I will focus more on the integration in 2.0. > But as long as we fix the system and make Nautilus work on it (as an example, > the last PluggableListMorph changes) it means that Nautilus for 1.4 and > Nautilus for 2.0 are different.
Thanks benjmain. Did you try the latest version in 20? because e thought it looks strange with esteban BTW do you know if the font problems in the pane was fixed? Because usman got problems but in 1.4. I thought I fixed all the text morph to use the settings and that it was in 1.4 Stef > > But for more Nautilus related bugs, I will try to fix them in both :) > > > Let's hope I can manage to do that ^^ > > Ben > > > On May 8, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> >> On May 8, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: >> >>> >>> Marcus Denker-4 wrote >>>> >>>> Nautilus... getting it ready will be double as hard if it has to run on >>>> both 1.4 and 2.0. >>>> >>> >>> Is Nautilus unsupported on 1.4? >> >> we should ask benjamin because he may fix the important problems. >> >> >>> There have been many suggestions to load it >>> in preference to the default browser in 1.4, so we should be clear whether >>> it will be expected to work. I guess then OB would be the only workable >>> option... but Nautilus is so cool - it's hard to go back, lol!! >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://forum.world.st/Nautilus-load-problem-tp4603363p4616242.html >>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> > >
