On May 16, 2012, at 8:58 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Steph, > > I would love to help you with ... I'm overloaded like everyone else, but > would squeeze out time for this if it makes sense …
Thanks dale. Hernan and one of his students started to work on a solution (not ring based) and we synced now in Sept we will receive him for three months and I hope to get some momentum. I will ask veronica and andy to let us know about their first experience. > > Dale > > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Stéphane Ducasse" <[email protected]> > | To: [email protected] > | Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:53:36 AM > | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Are we losing method versions? > | > | yes > | > | Now we would love to have a database storing all the methods based on > | the ring meta model > | > | > | > | > Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That > | > should explain that. > | > > | > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris > | > <[email protected]> wrote: > | > For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... > | > > | > In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 > | > 01:10' > | > In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: > | > "#('SeanDeNigris > | > 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" > | > In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: > | > 'SeanDeNigris > | > 8/5/2010 15:51' > | > > | > -- > | > View this message in context: > | > http://forum.world.st/Are-we-losing-method-versions-tp4630520.html > | > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > | > > | > > | > | > | >
