On 23 May 2012 19:48, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> On 23 May 2012 18:57, Sebastian Sastre <sebast...@flowingconcept.com> wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> this is kind of a show stopper for images in production :/
>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5965
>>>
>>
>> i thought we already dealt with it.
>> no?
>>
>
> No, the image as it is now just quits. Delayed our deployment of the ESUG 
> registration server
> for some weeks... normal seaside use, image quites after a day.
>
> It's far from obvious.
>
> I think the image should work out of the box. Why destinguish between 
> deployment and development?
> What is good in deployment is for sure gut in development.
>

perhaps we should write a watchdog of external semaphore table. to see
if semaphore orphaned
and detect by whom.


>        Marcus
>
> --
> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.

Reply via email to