Guys..the fact of having to make everything deprecated instead of removing
it is really a pain. Now ReferenceStream is not removed but
deprecated..meaning that it *should* work. So instead of removing
everything I have to change it a lot so that it "still" works but
deprecated. Can we just assume that ReferenceStream will be removed in 2.0
please?

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Ok. Perfect. So let's assume DataStream is used only for Motnicello. I
> will rename it to MCDataStream, move it to Monticello Package and see all
> what I can remove/clean.
> I will let you know.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Jun 4, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Pavel Krivanek <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >> I think it is a good proposal. Then it can be in separate package or
>> as part
>> >> of MC package.
>> >
>> > I would put DataStream and its friends within the monticello package,
>> > and prepend MC to their names. Then, you can clean the resulting
>> > classes if you want to.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Damien Cassou
>> > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
>> >
>> > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
>> > popular by not having them." James Iry
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>
>


-- 
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

Reply via email to