indeed this is a bit tricky... but what can you explicitely say :/ foo.tar foo.tar.gz foo.1.tar foo.1.tar.gz
it's rather hard to decide which is the real extension and which one not :) so it might make sense to define a couple of test cases to see what we want (and maybe compare it to ruby / python / java) maybe we can add at least an #extensions method returning a list or so. If you check `man basename` you can pass explicitly an extension name to be stripped away from the full basename. maybe that's a better strategy? we should definitely find a solution for this! On 2012-06-17, at 19:43, Guillermo Polito wrote: > Hi! > > I've seen that FS takes as a file extension everything after the first dot, > instead of the last one. > > Now, that conflicts with the naming we are using for our files: > > - changesets and fileouts often take the form something.cs, something.1.cs, > something.2.cs > - image names: pharo-2.0.image, pharo-2.0.1.image > > One of them has to be changed I think... :) > > Also, I'm more used to the other definition of extension: All after the > last dot :S > > Guille
