I did not open the issue. Please go ahead :) Doru
On 18 Jun 2012, at 20:59, Fabrizio Perin wrote: > Sorry, > back from long weekend offline. I can port the moose extensions to the core > indeed. > Doru did you open the issue already? > > Cheers, > Fabrizio > > > 2012/6/16 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > doru > > can you open a bug entry and provide necessary information? > Package and tests? > > Stef > > On Jun 16, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > > > Indeed. It would be great to integrate CollectionExtensions into Pharo. > > > > For example, we have: > > #(#(1) #(2 3) #(#(4) 5) ) deepFlatten > > ==> #(1 2 3 4 5) > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > On 15 Jun 2012, at 21:04, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > > >> fabrizio we should really include some of the moose extensions to pharo. > >> Could you take the lead on that? > >> > >> Did you try gather:? > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Fabrizio Perin wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> I need to flatten a collection which does not contain other collections > >>> necessarily. The method flatten doesn't really work: > >>> > >>> #(#(1 2) #(3 4)) flatten -> #(1 2 3 4) OK > >>> > >>> #(#(1) #(2 3) #(#(4) 5) ) flatten -> #(1 2 3 #(4) 5) I would have > >>> expected something like #(1 2 3 4 5) > >>> > >>> #(1 2 3) flatten -> error > >>> #(#(1) 2 3) flatten -> error > >>> > >>> Is this the meant behavior for flatten? Any other method I could use > >>> instead? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Fabrizio > >> > >> > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > "We are all great at making mistakes." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "What we can governs what we wish."
