Not being Glorp's author, I can tell it has over 600 green tests on pharo. Of course it can have it's problems, but you have some confidence it is ok, and some sources for examples :).
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>wrote: > while a lot of years of suffering are clamming that I need to say: "don't > use RDBMs if you can avoid it", I also should point you to > http://dbxtalk.smallworks.com.ar/, and GlorpDbx which is around and is > the newer port to Pharo you can find :) > > Esteban > > > On Jun 26, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > On 25 Jun 2012, at 21:41, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > > I'm interested in both, mainly with the focus on > > options for RDBM systems. Whats is the state of Glorp? > > > If have been using Glorp with Postgresql and it works surprisingly well. > It is 'good old technology', not as sexy as all this NoSQL stuff, but > reliable, well-known. > I think that Glorp is one of the coolest OO-RDBMS mappers around, in any > language. > > Sven > > > -- > Sven Van Caekenberghe > http://stfx.eu > Smalltalk is the Red Pill > > > > > > >
