On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]>wrote:
> exactly! > > http://guides.rubygems.org/ > > We should have a services where you can do: > > ConfigurationOfFoo publish. > > which will upload it to a central Metacello repository as well. > So you always find the bleeding edge config in the project's repos and > the more stable ones in the main metacello repository. > > ConfigurationOfFoo update. > > > Now I would like to have a more 'gem' like interface for metacello. > Simply do a `gem help commands` in your terminal and you'll see a handy > list of commands available. > > > Even if there are plans for nice UIs for Metacello at some time, we should > take care that we create a nice programming interface :) > > Dale's latest Metacello preview is moving exactly in this direction. Check it out if you haven't already, cool stuff. > On 2012-08-01, at 12:01, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi guys > > > > Configuration should not be only in metacello repository. Think objects! > > Now how can we commit the configuration of rb to the refactoring browser > repository? > > should we fork it for real. I think that we should migrate from squeak > source really soon now. > > > > Stef > > > > > > >
