Cami, How about writeStream* and readStream* are those working? It looks like you used those variants in your FileTree pull request...
Thanks, Dale ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Camillo Bruni" <[email protected]> | To: [email protected] | Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:06:18 AM | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] FileSystem differences between Pharo-2.0 and Pharo-1.4 | | in pharo 1.4 #fileStream and #fileStreamDo: & Co are not working | properly... | You'll still have to use something like | FileStream fileNamed: reference fullName | otherwise it should more or less work. | | | On 2012-08-08, at 18:36, Dale Henrichs <[email protected]> wrote: | | > I'm starting a port of FileTree to Pharo-2.0 and I'm planning on | > using Pharo-1.4 (summer) to do the actual port, since I can't run | > my development environment in Pharo-2.0 (chicken and egg problem). | > | > I'm wondering if there are any significant differences between the | > FileSystem implementations on the two platforms that I should be | > aware of... | > | > Dale | > | | |
