On Aug 9, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote:

> You're right! But notice that the RPackage logic of one to one mapping
> with categories, only
> breaks   when it  only provides extension methods as in the case of
> 'AST-Core' and 'RPackage'.
> 
> | p |
> p := RPackageOrganizer default packageNamed: 'AST-Core'.
> ( p extensionMethods size = 2 ) & ( p definedClasses size = 0 )
> 
> Only then, maybe this is a bug?

Yes 
Now just that you know.
RPackage ****import**** (system -> rpackageOrganizer) was done with the idea 
that we would map a category to 
a package.

Now we changed our mind, we will map a MCWorkingCopy to a RPAckage and 
categories will simply be class tags.

So if you want to get rpackage working as the default MCWorkingCopy, you have 
to change the import phase 
or wait that we do it.

Now we should sync with ben because nautilus may be confused (and do not show 
class tags).

Stef




> 
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Fernando Olivero 
>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Hi Mariano,
>> 
>> I've been using RPackage so i stumbled on the same "problem".
>> RPackage maps System Categories (one to one), thus your problem
>> happens because there's no category named 'RPackage'.
>> 
>> 
>> But for the rest it works. For example:
>> 
>> (RPackageOrganizer default packageNamed: 'AST-Core')
>> 
>> And there is no category 'AST-Core'.
>> 
>> Moreover, I have just discovered that if I evaluate:  RPackageOrganizer 
>> initialize.
>> Then it appears :)
>> 
>> 
>> For example evaluate  (RPackageOrganizer default packageNamed: 
>> 'RPackage-Core')
>> 
>> Saludos,
>> Fernando
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck
>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> (MCWorkingCopy allManagers  collect: [:p | p package name] ) includes: 
>>> 'RPackage' -> true
>>> 
>>> (RPackageOrganizer default packageNamed: 'RPackage') -> KeyNotFound
>>> 
>>> bug?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Mariano
>>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mariano
>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>> 
> 


Reply via email to