On 4 September 2012 15:19, Guido Chari <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is always a need for a vm. SqueakNos last release on mid 2011 was
> compatible only with an special compiled stackvm for x86 (this special vm
> strips out all the OS support and has a particular linking process). I'm not
> sure why someone would be willing to run sqnos on the Rasperry but anyway,
> the work for doing that should be the same than thatt for compiling the
> special stackvm from sqnos to ARM arquitecture.

No, there isn't always a need for a VM: Smalltalk's been demoed
running directly on a Mitsubishi chip, and you could always program an
FGPA or similar as your _machine_.

And as I mentioned, the Stack VM already runs on the Raspberry, so
assumed that Phil wanted something _more_ than that, and that's
running the image directly on hardware (or similar, like SqueakNOS).

frank

> It would be very interesting to think on going one step further and try to
> make sqnos compatible with the new cogvm and pharo 2.0. Hope to have some
> time to try it.
>
> Cheers,
> Guido.
>
> 2012/9/4 S Krish <[email protected]>
>>
>> That would be great..!..
>>
>> Need to order the pi and check it out..
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Frank Shearar <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4 September 2012 07:30, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:31 PM, S Krish
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> I am sure you should be able to run Tiny Core linux ( vanilla without
>>> >> WM) on
>>> >> Raspberry..  add Pharo ...
>>> >>
>>> > There is a Debian made specially for the hardware...
>>> > http://www.raspbian.org
>>> > I think this is what everyone is using.
>>> >
>>> > So the only thing missing is a VM...
>>>
>>> I assumed that Phil wants to run the image directly on the hardware,
>>> because the Pi already runs Squeak/Pharo/Scratch just fine.
>>>
>>> The SqueakNOS people might be able to help?
>>>
>>> frank
>>>
>>> >     Marcus
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Marcus Denker  --  [email protected]
>>> > http://www.marcusdenker.de
>>> >
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to