yeah, we are working on that... but there are still some RPackage issues non completely handled :(
I suppose for week-end we'll be back in a stable stage :) Esteban On Sep 5, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Dale Henrichs <[email protected]> wrote: > I am poised for getting the Metacello Preview running in Pharo2.0, but there > are a couple of stability issues that are outstanding at the moment, but I > believe Esteban and co. will hit that hard this week... > > Dale > > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Igor Stasenko" <[email protected]> > | To: [email protected] > | Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 11:37:05 AM > | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 2.0 + Travis = ? > | > | On 31 August 2012 18:54, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> > | wrote: > | > | >> This is something what you can do by yourself, isn't? :) > | > > | > Sure. And maybe I would have, if I didn't first have to get a Pharo > | > 2.0 image and then install it and then figure out the various new > | > APIs > | > and so on and so on. So instead I wimped out and asked a clear > | > question in a place where the experts on the relevant APIs would > | > have > | > a chance to see it :P > | > | i lost in negations :) > | clearly, i am not an expert in FS API (as most of others here). > | > | > > | >>> and the relevant code (I think) is > | >>> > | >>> transcriptStream := ((Smalltalk at: #FileSystem) > | >>> workingDirectory > | >>> / transcriptFileName) readStream > | >>> > | >> so, why you don't just wrap this thing with exception handler? > | >> > | >> [ transcriptStream := ((Smalltalk at: #FileSystem) > | >> workingDirectory / transcriptFileName) readStream > | >> > | >> ] on: Error do: [ aha... somethign wrong with that file ] > | >> > | >> this will prevent image from bailing out to OS. :) > | > > | > Well, no. Catching Error is a terrible idea. I'll just touch the > | > file > | > if it doesn't already exist. > | > > | > | so, then, following Sean's rule, it should be something beautiful > | like: > | > | 'bajsjn' asFileReference touch. > | > | Because i understood your question ("please open a readStream on this > | file and, if it's not there, make one") as: > | - if file exists, open it for reading and read smthng > | - if file doesn't exists create it (but apparently there will be > | nothing to read from) > | > | > Thanks for taking the trouble to answer the question, Igor. If it's > | > any consolation, this means Dale & I can get our CI stuff working > | > for > | > Pharo 2.0 that must quicker. > | > > | > | yes, that would be nice consolation :) > | > | > frank > | > | > | -- > | Best regards, > | Igor Stasenko. > | > | >
