Yes, in fact with Esteban we thought about merging our work or maybe I will drop my layer and use Voyage.
Nico On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:30:30 -0700, Francois Stephany <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok! > > I've managed to load it but haven't tried to run it (yet). I almost gave > up before realising that KO is the prefix used by Kalingrad :) > > It's cool to browse a real project using Seaside and Mongo. The way > Smalltalkhub maps Mongo and Smalltalk objects is interesting. It seems > to be more explicit than the Voyage approach. Have you considered to use > Voyage or to extract the smalltalkhub mapper to a indenpendent package > (a bit like mongoid, moped and origin in ruby[1])? > > Anyway, thanks for open sourcing it! > > Fa > > [1]http://mongoid.org/en/mongoid/index.html > > On 20/09/12 03:32, Nicolas Petton wrote: > > > > No, there's no configuration yet. > > > > Nico > > > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:05:10 -0700, Francois Stephany > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is there a Metacello configuration for it? > >> I'm trying to load it by hand but guessing the dependencies is tricky > >> for me. > >> > >> On 16/09/12 12:56, Camillo Bruni wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2012-09-16, at 21:29, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Good work ! > >>>> > >>>> Where can the code be found/seen ? > >>> > >>> all in the latest pharo SmalltalkHubRepository browse. > >>> > >>>> I am especially interested in the last point. Has it something to do > >>>> with (using) Zn ? > >>> > >>> yes, we basically did a HEAD request and returned false on 404, however > >>> Zn does 3 or so retries, and thus makes everything slow :). I don't know > >>> what > >>> the side-effects are, but we reduce the retryCount to 0, to get low > >>> response times. > >>> > >>> I thought that upon a valid 404 response there is no retry needed? (but I > >>> guess > >>> I miss something here :P) > >>> > -- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr
