On Sep 24, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: >> Thanks for taking time at ESUG to listen and learn more about our namespace >> >proposal. I believe that we have cleared up some of the misconceptions >> >surrounding this complex topic. > > What was the outcome of the discussion?
good question: I'm tired and my memory is weak. I will try to recall but it was clear and obvious that james got a point. in essence that we do not hardcode the resolution mechanism so that people can experiment. James? I'm sure that you will be more precise than me. Then camille should do a pass on his master and send it around. > Does the proposal fit or not? > What are the next steps? Send the master of camille around so that people can get a common understanding of the pros and cons. Do not expect namespace tomorrow, because we have plenty of other points to address first. And we lived without them during years so far so this is not namespace that we want but module. > > Thx > T. >
