On 9 October 2012 14:45, drush66 <[email protected]> wrote: > Igor Stasenko wrote >> On 9 October 2012 14:28, drush66 < > >> davorin.rusevljan@ > >> > wrote: >>> Igor Stasenko wrote >> run levels just adding another dimension into dependency soup. >> they don't solve the dependency problem.. >> when you say "i run at level 5, so everything which runs at level 4 >> will be initialized first" >> which is equal to saying " Facility A (level 5) should not be used >> before facility B (level 4) is >> initialized. > > They do not solve them, but they make i ta bit les fragile, since you do not > specify all facilities that have to run before your own, but you say, any > facility from some class (run level), should run before mine. So one can > write such rule without knowing explicit list of all facilities that need to > run before mine. > right, it is just grouping.
> But anyway, I have just posted this as an food for thoughts, if it helps or > not you decide. > imo, it would make sense, if we would have that many services as linux has. > > > > ----- > http://www.cloud208.com/ > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Global-session-object-tp4650371p4650580.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
