But mariano
two questions:
- did it change something?
- don't you have an idea of the chunk you will use for the increment?
Stef
On Nov 10, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Nicolas Cellier
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe pre-allocate the right size:
>
> ByteArray new: byteArray size * 16 streamContents: ...
>
>
> Well, actually we are trying to do a streaming API for a compressor. So, 1) I
> don't exactly know the number "16" before hand and 2) doing that is exactly
> what we are trying to avoid (compress/decompress all together). Instead, we
> are doing some kind of streaming, compressing in blocks of say 1MB. But I was
> completely surprised when I saw the results....
> So there is nothing easy to improve?
>
> Nicolas
>
> 2012/11/10 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>:
> > Hi guys:
> >
> > |byteArray|
> > byteArray := (ByteArray new: 1024*1024).
> > [
> > ByteArray streamContents: [:s |
> > 16 timesRepeat: [
> > s nextPutAll:byteArray
> > ]
> > ]
> > ] timeToRun
> >
> > Gives me around 1 second. Isn't that too much? or is it normal/expected?
> > Anything I could improve?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Mariano
> > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>
