+1

On Nov 12, 2012, at 9:57 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I completely agree that the PIer syntax is rather niche these days, but we 
> should not confuse the PIer syntax with the Pier model. I think that it would 
> be beneficial to capitalize on this model (and all the infrastructure built 
> on top of it) and simply create a Markdown support.
> 
> Cheers,
> Doru
> 
> 
> On 12 Nov 2012, at 15:56, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> You won I put a filter markdown to thrash on my mail sadly.
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 12, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>> 
>>>>> It depends at which level.
>>>>> Can you tag on word in markdown to have bold, italic, index?
>>> 
>>> stef, I already explained you that at least 4 times! Plus I gave you the 
>>> solutions,
>>> the only thing I don't have is the time to complete the Markdown parser!
>>> 
>>>>> If I would not have written 350 pages of seaside book with pier it would 
>>>>> be a different story but 
>>>>> so far pier syntax is good for doing everything: html, latex, even 
>>>>> markdown.
>>>> 
>>>> In Markdown, it is *italic* or _italic_ and **bold** and __bold__.
>>>> 
>>>> Now for index entries, I don't know exactly - making an automatic index is 
>>>> a special post process function anyway.
>>>> I think you could do something like [ReadStream][index-entry]s are objects 
>>>> that you can read bytes or characters from.
>>>> 
>>>> Making a book from several independent source files is quite a job that 
>>>> requires custom programming. It would be very cool if we could do all that 
>>>> in Smalltalk, using a good Markdown parser and a cool object 
>>>> representation.
>>>> 
>>>> I have nothing against Pier, but it is something that only exists in our 
>>>> niche world, not in the larger world out there. 
>>> 
>>> my words!
>>> 
>>> So we already had a Markdown / HelpSystem crossover for NativeBoost / 
>>> ASMJit where we injected
>>> custom URLs to add method and class links, that worked pretty well. So I 
>>> assume it will be 
>>> not that much work on top to get section links ready. 
>>> 
>>> Something like book://section/subsection is very easy to do, a bit verbose 
>>> maybe but very
>>> consistent.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> so, please support: 
>>> https://github.com/dh83/PPMarkdown
>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/petitmarkdown.html/
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> 
> "Every thing should have the right to be different."
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to