sounds like we are in a less is more stage we always have time for new nice surprises
let the incomplete stuff for later keep the great work sebastian o/ On Nov 21, 2012, at 8:58 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > new class builder is NOT marked for inclusion, I'm sorry (even as a preview) > > On Nov 21, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> On 2012-11-21, at 19:41, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > On Nov 21, 2012, at 11:37 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> > >> >> +1 for including only NB and then just bug fixes. No new stuff. >> >> So...slots and new classbuilder will be for next release. Same for Opal I >> >> guess. >> > >> > No Opal should be in previous as well as Athens. >> > These projects should come back to light. Else this will never happen. >> >> I think that the thing we did with filesystem in 1.4 was good >> - integrate the detached project >> - apply the refactorings during development >> >> then in the next release >> - change tools to use the new infrastructure >> - remove old code >> >> I think we did almost the same with Zinc, no? >> >> >> What about NOT including new class builder nor Opal in 2.0 but as soon as we >> create the initial repo for 2.1 (or whatever), the first 2 things we do is >> to integrate them? >> >> >> -- >> Mariano >> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >> >
